Nic said:
David Schwimmer in it, you needn't look any further to know it's pants.
Nic said:
Bill Nighy in a Richard Curtis film; could only be made worse by the inclusion of Hugh Grant or Julia Roberts (or worse, both of them in the same film, now THAT would really suck).
I watched Inception again on Saturday night. My view hasn't changed at all from the cinema.
It's a all shiny polish and superb (mis?)direction to fool you into the thinking that it's a deep and complicated story that's actually good.
It isn't, really, it isn't. It's a very simply film with a handful of superb set pieces that just make you think it's good. It's slow paced for the most part and it falls apart as soon as you start to actually pick at it. It withers under the tiniest scrutiny.
Don't get me wrong, Nolan is very clever. It's hard to realise you're being taken for a ride, and he simply ignores the bits that could do with being explained.
I watched eXistenZ with Minor_Furie about a month ago, and he finished watching it and said "that was just like Inception, only better". I didn't believe him at the time (though I did still enjoy eXistenZ), but having had a second sit through of Inception, he was right.
The feeling of being lost in the dream within a dream portrayed in eXistenZ was much stronger and the story was much more complex. It wasn't as bedazzling, but it felt like a much more solid and fulfilling experience at the end. Inception just left me feeling a bit bored. The Arctic section at the end, it was dreadful.
I could say a lot more, but I've probably already upset too many people
At least it wasn't as bad as The Prestige
Also watched V for Vendetta with madame_f and Minor_f. Neither had seen it, so I recorded it for them. I find the film is superb at the start. It's very sharp, tight, compelling and witty. Then it gets a bit lost and meanders for a while before finding its footing again and getting on with it. It always feels a bit false, which is a shame, something you notice more in the slower parts - you know it's in a film studio somewhere. Overall though, it's a simple, satisfying film in the end - plus it has John Hurt, how could it go wrong? :lol: