Neal said:
Smithy, did it not occur to you to pay attention to the argument and how civilised and high brow it was before deciding to use the "Stoke are scum" argument as a basis for your post?
Neal, did it not occur to you that by rushing to have a pop at me after every single post I make is just making you look like an enormous twat. If I was a child and took the things some mong on the internet said seriously, I'd be crying bully right now, but instead I just find it hilarious that you seem to hold a sort of vendetta against everything I say, purely because it's said by me.
And if it's so 'high brow', why did you completely ignore everything I'd said prior to the last comment. Oh I see, it was completely valid and therefore you had to ignore it to have your latest dig at me. Good one, bully.
Explain to me how that is the basis of my post? Logically, since I'm an Arsenal fan, the basis for my post will be commenting on the loss of our greatest young prospect? But no, acknowledging this would require using your common sense, which you ignored in favour of having (yet another) pop at me. And yet I'm viewed as the argumentative trouble maker? Pathetic.
Brookes said:
^I agree on Match of the Day it showed before Shawcross tackled him his foot was twisted in the ground so he had already done something then.
Smithy said:
Also, Stoke fans are scum. Fair play, the majority cheered him off, but an awful lot of them were singing abuse to Ramsey whilst he was being stretchered off.
You do realise you've just cancelled out you're own point. You generalise all Stoke fans as being scum, and then you say the majority cheered him off. Where I sit there are a lot of people who sing bad chants, but I couldn't hear anything of abuse to Ramsey, if anything it was worse from the Arsenal fans jumping out of the stand to try and get Shawcross. From what I could see, all the Stoke's fans were clapping when Ramsey was being stretchered off and there was no abuse to him at all. Being a Stoke fan, I don't accept your argument at all.
And I still don't believe he should have been sent off, but I agree about the media and how he wouldn't have been able to play on, but a decision to send somebody off shouldn't be decided by whether the FA will have a bad reputation.
It's clear to see who I was referring to. Because I left one word out, it's instantly a generalisation. If I had simply said STOKE FANS ARE SCUM and then nothing else, fair play, that's a generalisation. But I explained why I thought the minority of fans who did what they did were scum.
And there were countless fans clapping Ramsey as most of them are human, but there was enough to hear them chanting abuse at Ramsey over the sombre applause. This was confirmed to me by two lads off the Arsenal forum who were at the game.
If the leg wasn't broken, he still could have been sent off, although I'm not saying it's fair. It's the sort of 50/50 challenge where sometimes players get injured badly (Ramsey), sometimes it shows great commitment, sometimes players get red cards, sometimes the ref ignores it. It's one of those that you really can't say either or, as so many referees will judge it differently. I said at the time and I say it now though. It was a 50/50, Shawcross DID NOT set out to injure Ramsey, and I feel for the lad who will now have this hanging over him.