Also, the back attachment that @Pear talked about is now on the train.
Yeah, I think the camera just slid when the train crested the hill before the second launch.WOW, just watched it. That hill after the first loop is gonna deliver for sure. However, it's kind of odd and worth noting that as soon as the train hits the second launch at 0:43 in that video, the camera seems to be crooked as if the train was on a bank. Maybe this is safety clearances in the design? Or perhaps the camera slid a tad off its position?
I hate to be that person but.......it looks kind of slow. Maybe because I haven't done many Mack launches so I'm comparing it to Intamin. I mean I like Icon and Operation Enterprise but they're kind of floaty rather than speedy and this seemed to be marketed as kind more rough round the edges but maybe that's just because it's in the US and has an american wilderness/country kind of theme? The layout looks cool though so I'm intrigued by that anyhow. I think it's safe to say it won't be crap, just wondered how good it will be on the good to amazing scale. Still nice to see Mack building these in the US though.
*waits for replies about wheel materials, slow preliminary launch testing and that recurring "macks are meant to be slower, it's totally different from an intamin" discussion that always comes up haha*
DC Rivals isn't the exception to the LAUNCH intensity rule, which is what @FistedColossus is talking about, mind.Based on reviews, DC Rivals is apparently the only exception to the intensity rule. I've heard that thing is crazy.