Tim said:
They are the public, and therefore the park's audience.
If they aren't on board with what has been presented to them, then there's clearly a problem.
Despite everything I say...
The people responding to the presentation are a very tiny sample of the people who will experience this ride and even of who are aware of it. As always, it's the minority of highly critical people who are sailing this particular ship. If they're not on board, it's because Alton have tried to sell an ageing Dell laptop to a Macbook owner.
The flip side of this though... I think it was deliberately sold to enthusiasts (both "real" enthusiasts like us who are active, and the passive ones with a high level of interest). By selling it to us and getting us on board, they can push it harder to the general public. If the UK's self proclaimed coaster expert says it's fantastic (or some other lie like 'Infusion is a brilliant new ride'
) then it gives the coaster some credibility. However, if you push too much as Alton have done here, it does backfire with the negative reactions.
Or does it? Maybe there are a lot of people who want to prove the fat, greasy, sweaty keyboard king enthusiasts wrong? I suspect that a lot of passing people treat us with a degree of contempt for taking it all so seriously, and will come to ride it just to make a point
It's a terribly complex issue. I think I may go and get drunk to let me see it all a bit clearer :lol:
[Edit]Oh yeah... I agree with Tim about the film thing 100%. You can't compare watching somebody on a ride and off-ride to watching somebody else watch a film. Despite not actually riding it, I have a wealth of experience in coasters and flat rides (both big and small) to draw comparisons on. While you can't get it 100% accurate, it IS possible to get a very good idea of things. I don't think based on that people are being too harsh at all, but there's no way those faces would have been the same on the first ever ride on Bizarro or El Toro.