Its meant to be a horror, but there nothing scary about it.
Wrong, it's a drama, it's based around a storyline, not people getting killed by monsters.
The bridge disappears and then a few minutes later theres a car in the town which just came over that bridge.
*spoiler*
The foggy silent hill is not real, The protagonist is either dead from the car crash, or has been knocked unconscious, either way she is in purgatory, and the reason that her home when she returns at the end is foggy and dark like Silent hill (And is seemingly separate from her husband's "Reality") is that her agreement with the devil to help alessa get revenge on the cultists meant that she would be forever stuck 'between worlds'. Her husband and the policeman are in the real Silent hill, where nothing out of the ordinary is happening.
It had no story line and was hard to follow.
If it had no storyline, what was it exactly that you found hard to follow?
-Not scary
-I laughed at most parts
-The "plot" is ****?
You went into the cinema with the wrong impression of the film. To be honest, if you didn't understand the storyline, you would probably think it was crap. It was a very cleverly made film. I would explain the plot to you to exemplify that it's not crap but I wouldn't want to spoil it, it's based around Occult relegion, witchcraft, the whole deal with the 2 girls is complex and not obvious on first viewing, perhaps. All the "monsters" can be metaphorically related to things in the story (Hence they are not there to 'scare' you, they are integral to the plot) The 'darkness' is nto a random scare, it's explained why it happens, and features extensive linking between the devil and the Alessa and... and... and... gah, don't slag off a film you didn't even understand.
</garbled attempt at explaining a complex film to a peabrain>
It's a sequel to a funny cartoon film with a poor plot line. Surprisingly it's a cartoon film with a poor plot line, not quite as good as the original...
