Part of me hopes they go back to manufacturing the track like the did with the first couple. WW and Railblazer both seem to be pretty smooth, but the newer ones all seem to hit each track joint. Does anyone know why they changed this?
There could be some manufacturing difference that's not immediately visible, but from the prototypes to the newer versions, there's no difference in how the track joints are connected. They both sit end to end, with these joining plates on the top & bottom face, then the rails can be ground down to create a "smooth" transition if needed.
![1719414649030.png 1719414649030.png](https://coasterforce.com/forums/data/attachments/32/32169-2cfee2326333cf506014359fc5f24031.jpg)
The solution to make these properly smooth would be to have a full steel plate, edge to edge on the
entire top face, that extends over the track joints (just like the IBox track does). I personally think this just wasn't doable with how narrow the track is.
I've only done Railblazer 5 years ago, so I can't speak for the smoothness of others, but it could be a real park-by-park thing where lots of factors (general maintenance, train tolerances, quality of fabrication/installation, etc.) can determine why one's smooth and one's not. But I have no idea.