SilverArrow said:The retro lover in me likes the use of bringing in the ghost train concept- I do wonder whether it will actually feature any parallels with it's classic namesakes though.
Yeah, I think you are right. I makes no difference but it was an initial thought.Martyn B said:SilverArrow said:The retro lover in me likes the use of bringing in the ghost train concept- I do wonder whether it will actually feature any parallels with it's classic namesakes though.
I think the term "ghost train" is being used here because of the actual train, and being scary. I can't see there being any connections what so ever with a traditional ghost train. At a guess, there could be 3 or 4 of these carriage, and it all takes place inside, whilst you're sat down with the head set on.
This isn't trying to start an argument, it's a genuine question - where does it state that it's an 'actor led experience' in the press release? I've glazed over them, but couldn't actually see that stated?Joey said:What I don't like... Another horror experiential attraction, VR and the the idea of another actor led attraction. With the exception of VR, there's a history of these elements not working at Merlin parks. The use of actors is likely a way to maximize project budget, but it effectively fobbing the costs over to the parks who then have to make decisions to cut those staff wages later. How similar this sounds to Sub Terra worries me, not because I didn't like Sub Terra, but because it had problems that shouldn't be repeated. Another thing I don't like is how the video implies its really groundbreaking to the world of theme parks - I guess they're talking about the VR, but it implies overall experience. It implies we're getting a Universal standard experience. I'm pretty confident we cannot possibly be. Goes back to what Ben said. VR in itself is a worry for a bazillion reasons for me - operational, hygiene, reliability and quality of footage.
I have the same question, as when I first read it I thought it referred to Live Actors as well, then as I was writing my earlier response I double checked the release and it states "Live Action".Lofty said:This isn't trying to start an argument, it's a genuine question - where does it state that it's an 'actor led experience' in the press release? I've glazed over them, but couldn't actually see that stated?Joey said:What I don't like... Another horror experiential attraction, VR and the the idea of another actor led attraction. With the exception of VR, there's a history of these elements not working at Merlin parks. The use of actors is likely a way to maximize project budget, but it effectively fobbing the costs over to the parks who then have to make decisions to cut those staff wages later. How similar this sounds to Sub Terra worries me, not because I didn't like Sub Terra, but because it had problems that shouldn't be repeated. Another thing I don't like is how the video implies its really groundbreaking to the world of theme parks - I guess they're talking about the VR, but it implies overall experience. It implies we're getting a Universal standard experience. I'm pretty confident we cannot possibly be. Goes back to what Ben said. VR in itself is a worry for a bazillion reasons for me - operational, hygiene, reliability and quality of footage.
I'm sure the video said something that implied it. So, I guess not confirmed and sorry for making it sound that way.Lofty said:This isn't trying to start an argument, it's a genuine question - where does it state that it's an 'actor led experience' in the press release? I've glazed over them, but couldn't actually see that stated?Joey said:What I don't like... Another horror experiential attraction, VR and the the idea of another actor led attraction. With the exception of VR, there's a history of these elements not working at Merlin parks. The use of actors is likely a way to maximize project budget, but it effectively fobbing the costs over to the parks who then have to make decisions to cut those staff wages later. How similar this sounds to Sub Terra worries me, not because I didn't like Sub Terra, but because it had problems that shouldn't be repeated. Another thing I don't like is how the video implies its really groundbreaking to the world of theme parks - I guess they're talking about the VR, but it implies overall experience. It implies we're getting a Universal standard experience. I'm pretty confident we cannot possibly be. Goes back to what Ben said. VR in itself is a worry for a bazillion reasons for me - operational, hygiene, reliability and quality of footage.
Joey said:Something I rather like but I am confused by is the design team having a face again - it's like the Wardley days. I find that interesting, adds a sense of genuineness and... I dunno, artistry? Dunno maybe this is just me being weird.