It has recently been discussed in some threads how certain parks, chains - heck, whole countries' entire amusement scene - aren't exactly swimming in money. Times are tough, parks are less profitable, competition isn't what it used to, or previous thrifts of extravagant spending have put the company in a tighter spot. Either way, let's assume your favourite park has fallen into this situation, and investment budgets have to be scaled back. Not all the way to zero, mind you, but it means there won't be any Dive Machines, Hypers, or multi-launch force machines coming your way in the next few years. Or, as put by @Ben in one of the relevant threads:
But good things have sometimes been made on shoestring budgets. And there are a lot of suppliers in the amusement industry, some of them geared towards parks or chains with less money to spend than your average multi-gate destination resort. It is possible for a park to fence off an open area nobody uses and haul in something mounted on a trailer, and the guests might even end up liking it.
So how could parks keep you (or general thrill enthusiasts) happy without digging deep in their pockets? What's the least expensive thing that'd make you happy with the park's investment? Could it go all the way down to leasing stuff for a season or two? Or would you rather see them build nothing at all than something cheap, unthemed, maybe even temporary?
Discuss!
Basically you’ll get stuff, it’ll just be poo.
But good things have sometimes been made on shoestring budgets. And there are a lot of suppliers in the amusement industry, some of them geared towards parks or chains with less money to spend than your average multi-gate destination resort. It is possible for a park to fence off an open area nobody uses and haul in something mounted on a trailer, and the guests might even end up liking it.
So how could parks keep you (or general thrill enthusiasts) happy without digging deep in their pockets? What's the least expensive thing that'd make you happy with the park's investment? Could it go all the way down to leasing stuff for a season or two? Or would you rather see them build nothing at all than something cheap, unthemed, maybe even temporary?
Discuss!