Crazycoaster
Giga Poster
They fill the track with sand post-fabrication these days, which means they have to cut a hole into it, and then place a cap on top.
That's what I thought.They fill the track with sand post-fabrication these days, which means they have to cut a hole into it, and then place a cap on top.
I wonder if it truly is still sand? I'd be interested to know if there are any other sorts of filler they could use (thinking like insulating foam kinda thing) that would achieve the same job? Or is the density of the sand still one of the critical factors.They fill the track with sand post-fabrication these days, which means they have to cut a hole into it, and then place a cap on top.
I wonder if it truly is still sand? I'd be interested to know if there are any other sorts of filler they could use (thinking like insulating foam kinda thing) that would achieve the same job? Or is the density of the sand still one of the critical factors.
I thought it was Coco Pop's?Sand is a common misconception. It is often pea gravel.
I thought it was Coco Pop's?
Can you link the original layout for this? I am really intrigued to compared its final version to its original plan.I really wish they could have kept that last inversion!
Yes I agree, it adds a nice bit of variation into the layout.I think 4 almost identical inversions is a bit overkill really. Might get a pop of airtime on the new version
No the layout is definitely similar. Three zero-g rolls, airtime, and a junior Immelmann. Hals also has those.In an odd kind of way, that layout almost looks a bit like B&M’s take on the Vekoma STC; maybe it’s all the rolls, but it looks to have some similarities to Hals-uber-Kopf to me. I’m probably overthinking it a bit, but I do think the layout looks somewhat similar.
I do think the layout looks very unique compared to other B&M inverts, and it should be a really, really fun ride!
Is it only me who sees that?
Given that this was originally conceived sometime in or before 2017 (figuring when this thread was created), I think saying it's B&M's take on Vekoma's model is probably a bit unfair. When this came out, the STC wasn't publicly revealed (to my knowledge), so B&M probably weren't really given that as any sort of reference. My guess is they were approached to create some kind of freak-child somewhere between OzIris and the Chinese FICs.In an odd kind of way, that layout almost looks a bit like B&M’s take on the Vekoma STC; maybe it’s all the rolls, but it looks to have some similarities to Hals-uber-Kopf to me. I’m probably overthinking it a bit, but I do think the layout looks somewhat similar.
As far as I was aware Vekoma only made the lift structure for Wildfire. The rest of the ride was RMC.We have to remember that Parks & Resorts Scandinavia, the owners of Gröna Lund are huge Vekoma fans. Most coasters they have added in the last couple of years have been from Vekoma. Fireball at Furuviksparken and Wildfire at Kolmården. They also have more Vekoma coasters than coasters from any other manufacturer.
Had a chat with one of the managers at Kolmården who said that the guy in charge of ride acquisitions is a huge coaster enthusiast with hundreds of credits (forgot his name) and that the company regularly sends it's managers to Orlando/Tampa to try out rides. So Monster might have been inspired by Montu and Dragon Challenge. He said that they made the decision to get Ikaros after riding Falcon's Fury at BGT. The manager I talked to also said he was very impressed by Mako, so let's hope that Sweden will soon be getting it's first hyper!