MestnyiGeroi
Giga Poster
Coaster enthusiasts often get into a mode of discussing some coasters as if they were medieval torture devices. When I hear this kind of talk, I wonder what makes people who love coasters so much talk about some of them with such hate. Is it one of these:
1. When you ride a lot of coasters you learn to discriminate between superior and inferior ones, and over time you tend to express this knowledge by instinctively exaggerating how bad the inferior ones are -- making them not just inferior, but horrifically bad.
or
2. No, it's far simpler: people can love great coasters but still have absolutely terrible experiences on the bad ones.
If the second, simpler explanation is true, then I feel particularly fortunate, as I think I have more or less enjoyed every coaster I've been on so far. I mean, I've experienced significant pain on some coasters, even on some rides on some of my favorite coasters (Skyrush, El Toro, Lightning Rod), but I still loved them despite this. But when I think of the roughest coaster I can recall -- Super Flight, the Zamperla Volare at Rye Playland -- I still came off laughing. I was shaking my head at how ridiculously rough the ride was, but I'd enjoyed the bizarre experience overall (even if I was NOT about to get back on).
So, maybe I'm just inexperienced (coaster count 190 right now). Maybe I'm lucky with my constitution. Or maybe I'm just blessed with a stupidly nondiscriminating coaster palette. I don't know, but I'm glad I haven't yet had the kind of horrific experience I hear others complain about.
So my question: We've all had rough or painful rides here and there, maybe enough to make you dislike the coaster overall or maybe not. BUT WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COASTERS THAT YOU'VE RIDDEN COULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ENJOYED ON THE WHOLE? (In other words, despite any roughness, if you were forced to give a final, simple thumbs up or thumbs down to every coaster you've been on, how would the percentages break?)
1. When you ride a lot of coasters you learn to discriminate between superior and inferior ones, and over time you tend to express this knowledge by instinctively exaggerating how bad the inferior ones are -- making them not just inferior, but horrifically bad.
or
2. No, it's far simpler: people can love great coasters but still have absolutely terrible experiences on the bad ones.
If the second, simpler explanation is true, then I feel particularly fortunate, as I think I have more or less enjoyed every coaster I've been on so far. I mean, I've experienced significant pain on some coasters, even on some rides on some of my favorite coasters (Skyrush, El Toro, Lightning Rod), but I still loved them despite this. But when I think of the roughest coaster I can recall -- Super Flight, the Zamperla Volare at Rye Playland -- I still came off laughing. I was shaking my head at how ridiculously rough the ride was, but I'd enjoyed the bizarre experience overall (even if I was NOT about to get back on).
So, maybe I'm just inexperienced (coaster count 190 right now). Maybe I'm lucky with my constitution. Or maybe I'm just blessed with a stupidly nondiscriminating coaster palette. I don't know, but I'm glad I haven't yet had the kind of horrific experience I hear others complain about.
So my question: We've all had rough or painful rides here and there, maybe enough to make you dislike the coaster overall or maybe not. BUT WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COASTERS THAT YOU'VE RIDDEN COULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ENJOYED ON THE WHOLE? (In other words, despite any roughness, if you were forced to give a final, simple thumbs up or thumbs down to every coaster you've been on, how would the percentages break?)