What's new
FORUMS - COASTERFORCE

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What other kind of B&M should have a Launch?

A launched flyer? interesting...
The more I think about it, the more I like the idea. But if it happens anywhere, it'll probably be China.

An invert or a hyper could work too, but to catapult a 20 tonne B&M hyper train over a 200+ft hill would take one hell of a launch!
 
Howie,

Check this bad boy out then...

[youtubevid]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjFVF2uv7hM[/youtubevid]

Not quite a B&M Hyper train but still 24 rides and 4 across seating.
 
The most unique, novel B&M to be launched would be a flyer - we have seen launched versions of other train types already. Even a simple application as a lift launch immediately into a pretzel roll would be a fantastic element.
 
Howie said:
A launched flyer? interesting...
The more I think about it, the more I like the idea. But if it happens anywhere, it'll probably be China.

How about a flyer that launches into a pretzel loop? Come on B&M, get your act together.
 
Yeah a flyer would be the most interesting launched experience, particularly an inclined launch or launch into an inversion. Personally I don't think the bulky track and heavy trains of a B&M would really suit a launch, they don't seem as nippy or snappy as the best launched coasters.
 
A short hyper train would work very well. If it's just four cars long, it wouldn't be so crazy to launch. I'm not suggesting a hyper-style layout, but perhaps that could work.
 
You need the same amount of energy to launch a coaster train as you do to haul it up a lift hill, so the train weight isn't really a limiting factor - provided the launch system is durable enough, of course.

I think B&M could make a good launched sit-down coaster (or perhaps I should say more than one good launched sit-down coaster), with or without a floor. They make good coasters with lift hills, and past the initial drop it doesn't matter much whether the ride was propelled by gravity or a launch. Likewise, I think they could create some amazing launched Inverts, though it would sacrifice the "suspended high in the air with nothing below you" feeling. Same goes for Flyers. A launch would be exciting, but a lift hill is too, so the overall experience would neither be improved nor worsened by a launch.

Last, I'm going to suggest making a launched version of their Family Suspended coasters, just because nobody else has yet.
 
Pokemaniac said:
You need the same amount of energy to launch a coaster train as you do to haul it up a lift hill, so the train weight isn't really a limiting factor - provided the launch system is durable enough, of course.
C'mon Poke, you know better than that... ;)

A lift hill with a drop that gives the train a max speed of 60 mph, and a launch to a max speed of 60 mph have both given the train the same amount of energy. However the lift hill did it in a minute or so, whereas the launch did it in four seconds. The launch requires a lot more power, which is the crux of the issue.

Accelerating a heavy train is doable if you've got the infrastructure to support that sort of power draw (or the money to invest in energy storage). The B&M trains are really big and heavy, which I think is probably partly why Thunderbird only has five cars, rather than Gatekeeper or X-Flight with eight. Hulk is an exception of course, but that's a unique case so not enough to form any real trends from.
 
Back
Top