What's new

Titanic theme park in China

Ian

From CoasterForce
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Social Media Team
I'm slightly obsessed with the Titanic. I live near Southampton (where almost a third of the people who died came from), my great Uncle was onboard and survived and, I'm not ashamed to say, I like the 1997 film.

Anyway, in 2016, a Titanic "theme park" is opening in China. Fab.

My local rag sensationally said:
IT IS one of the most tragic events in world history and affected hundreds of Southampton families.

But now the sinking of Titanic could become one of the world’s most popular attractions after plans were unveiled for a theme park in China based on the 1912 disaster which killed 1,500 people.

The £100m project is being funded by the Seven Star Energy Investment Group and will be based in the landlocked Sichuan province, 932 miles from the nearest ocean.

It would include a simulator that would allow hundreds of people to feel the “shake and tumble” of the shipwreck.

Theme park goers will experience the feeling of water pouring down on them through light and sound effects – leaving them fearing they may drown.

But the idea has sparked fierce criticism in Hampshire, with the plan slammed as “insensitive” and “deplorable”.

Douglas Piper, 80, whose grandfather John Barnes was a fireman on the ship, said: “This is exploitation. I don’t go in for that sort of thing and I don’t like anyone who wants to make money or jokes out of a disaster.”

Mr Piper, from Sholing, secretary of the Solent branch of the Merchant Navy Association, added: “The idea should never have got off the ground but you just can’t control people who want to make money.”

Geoff Watts, founder of the Friends of Southampton Old Cemetery, which has memorials to survivors of the disaster as well as those lost at sea, said it was a “bad idea”.

He said: “I can’t speak for the society on the whole, but personally it’s not something I want to see. Our attitude is one of respect the whole story, of the Titanic and those who died or survived it. Our Titanic memorial tours are thoroughly respectful.”

Rudi Newman, honorary secretary of the British Titanic Society, said the plan was “frankly deplorable”.

He said: “When Clive Palmer started suggesting a ‘Titanic 2’ there were positives and negatives and public opinion on that project hinged on whether it was treated like a theme park.

“To actually have a theme park being proposed is in incredibly poor taste.

Whatever next, the Pompeii experience?”

He added: “An amusement park based on a truly horrible disaster is frankly deplorable.”

But others have defended the park, including actor Bernard Hill, who appeared as doomed Captain Edward Smith in the hit 1997 James Cameron film Titanic.

He was at the launch of the project in Hong Kong and insisted the attraction “would not belittle the disaster”.

Su Shaojun, chief executive of Seven Star, added: “We think it’s worth spreading the spirit of the Titanic. The universal love and sense of responsibility shown during the Titanic shipwreck represent the spiritual richness of human civilisation.

We will let people experience water coming in by using sound and light effects. They will think, ‘The water will drown me, I must escape with my life’.”

The park, expected to open in 2016, would also feature a manmade beach, a ‘6D’ cinema and replicas of European castles.

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/1094497 ... heme_park/

Tbh, I have no problem with theme park rides and being based on real life disasters. Do you?
 
Part of me loves it, part of me thinks it's quite offensive?
I think it depends on how they do it to be honest, but seeing as it's going to be a 'theme park', chances are they will make the disaster into something amusing and fun.

In my opinion, I think specific disasters should be kept in museums, not exploited as fun and entertaining in an amusement park. Maybe if they constantly give visitors true facts about what exactly happened, it won't be SO bad, but I doubt they will tbh.

Plus, I really can't imagine Chinese millionaires actually caring about what happened, because to me, it looks like they're using the tragedy as a sort of 'IP', or brand, for marketing purposes.

So basically, I don't 100% agree with it tbh, but it's not worth arguing about!
 
Suggesting that disasters shouldn't be used for entertainment is fair enough morally, but what about Twister? Tidal Wave? And of course, as the guy in the article is unaware of, Escape from Pompeii? There have never been complaints about those rides. The film is just as much exploiting the disaster for entertainment (and therefore for money) purposes, and it also certainly embellishes. Of course the film has a much more sombre tone than any theme park would be able to pull off without seeming weird, but it's the same principle.

I think it sounds interesting, but I would rather designers came up with original ideas rather than take overused ones. It's all about the money of course though.
 
This thing will be a disaster. Maybe it will hit a iceberg ;]

Posting from behind you. I have a knife...
 
It's not like the Chinese are trying to offend anyone. But it gets the local rag a chance to get a sensationalist story in the paper. Sounds like it could be pretty good if they're chucking a load of money at it - obviously it takes more than that, but I can't imagine it being awful.
 
Casio said:
Suggesting that disasters shouldn't be used for entertainment is fair enough morally, but what about Twister? Tidal Wave? And of course, as the guy in the article is unaware of, Escape from Pompeii?

Tidal Wave isn't aimed at a specific disaster though, is it? However you're right about Pompeii.

I dunno. I've still got mixed opinions.
 
It's like Brian Regan said, eventually theme parks will get way out of hand. "JFK - The Ride!"


Posted while reading your mind.
 
The still non-existent Paramount park in Korea had a Titanic experience/simulator listed, along with some concept art. Nobody seemed to give a **** about the appropriateness of that.
 
Top