0 - in these days of the internet, most people judge coasters based on a POV or someone else's stupid opinion of a ride posted on some social media?
Yes, *I'm* the one worrying about it too much, by not commenting on it for a week while you kept bringing it up ... almost as if you thought you had a coherent point to make, rather than just 'taking the piss.' But I'll ignore your repeating your weird, delusional accusation yet again in your first paragraph, and I'll take the new urine-extraction pose in the parentheses; it's an improvement.The "0" comment was against the utter stupidity of forming opinions based on POVs or someone else's viewpoint.
Good that you recognise an example of this, by far not the only example on here, so not directed at you solely.
(and if you expect coaster geeks on the internet to not take the piss, I think you have a lot to learn - its all good clean fun, don't worry about it too much)
I agree with this (and yes, with davidm's original "dunno, it depends"), which is why I can't answer my own question.It takes.... however many rides one has on it, surely?
Whether you've ridden something once, or a hundred times (or in some cases, not at all) you still make a judgment about it. Maybe not the judgment, maybe not your final judgment, maybe not even the popular judgment... but a judgment nonetheless. Semantics? Probably, but in the end all any of us can do is judge a coaster by how many times we've ridden it.
Which is basically yet another way of saying "Dunno, it depends" then.
I agree with what you say, but wow, that's some meticulous record-keeping!I'm with @Hixee 100% on this: the ideal scenario allows you to ride multiple times in front, back, middle, etc. to get the best feel of the roller coaster.
Yet so much of our riding experience is also contextual, and depends on the exact moment we rode. Weather, time of day, the group you visit with, riding on the wheel, etc. all play into your perception of the ride, and will vary each and every time you ride. This is why I have placed RF II, Maverick, and Storm Chaser so high - I have ridden all of these roller coasters in so many different conditions, and each time was just as good as the next. AND in turn, I rank X2 higher than most, because I have only ever ridden it at night, with a fun group of friends, and always had a blast. My personal rankings are a hodgepodge of statistically significant, good roller coaster, and what also felt good at the time.
Of my top ranked roller coasters, it's actually surprising to reflect how little I have ridden each one respectively. I guess overall, I have simply stuck to how each ride felt, and rerode whenever possible (though apparently that isn't often).
Those were best guesses at ridership, especially the higher counts. But... my full ranking spreadsheet goes even further... with charts!I agree with what you say, but wow, that's some meticulous record-keeping!
(And I don't think I've ever seen a top twenty with Apocalypse in it. I mean, for me the ride gets unfairly maligned as I liked it enough, but I'm still surprised to see it in a top twenty.)
I totally understand - having only ridden X2 ~11:30 PM at night after an exhausting day in the park; I'd fear what the ride experience would be like in the beginning of the day when I'm full of more energy.The most notable is my number one, X2. I only got one ride, but I don't think any ride could ever beat that one ride. Timing, seat, and expectations were perfect. It just blew away everything I possibly could have thought I was going to experience. I'm afraid a reride would actually harm the ride's position.