I think the problem is that the episodes are a little too short. They're trying to cram too much in to 45 minutes. So the script suffers.
I liked the new Daleks, I think they're a good nod back to the Tom Baker ones (it was the Tom Baker Daleks that were Smartie cupcakes wasn't it?)
Best bit though EVER! "Would you like a nice cup of tea?" I've been waiting years to hear a Dalek ask the Doctor if he wants a cuppa!
But yeah, real mixed bag. Potentially a good episode, but it WAS let down by a rushed plot either too big for one episode, or too small and stretched - I can't decide which yet.
It's odd... Doctor Who was one of those fantastic sci-fi shows that "spanned". There was something uniquely British about the three or four episode stories that left you on a cliff hanger at the end of each part. You couldn't wait for next Saturday to see what happened.
Oddly, we've now got Dr Star Trek Who. Each episode is pretty much a self contained "opening mystery, work for resolution, clever idea, win" pattern Star Trek always fell into.
Conversely, the Americans have taken on board our long episode stories and made them into the latest hits (Lost, 24, lots of others ). So Dr Who is like 70's/80's American Sci-Fi now, but the Americans are creating series which have more in common with 60's/70's/80's Dr Who.
Having said that, if you watch classic Dr Who, the episodes tend to be the actors wandering aimlessly around for most of the episode in cardboard corridors searching for something obscure and hiding around corners "waiting for the coast to be clear". At least the new Who tends to be quite action packed
I liked the new Daleks, I think they're a good nod back to the Tom Baker ones (it was the Tom Baker Daleks that were Smartie cupcakes wasn't it?)
Best bit though EVER! "Would you like a nice cup of tea?" I've been waiting years to hear a Dalek ask the Doctor if he wants a cuppa!
But yeah, real mixed bag. Potentially a good episode, but it WAS let down by a rushed plot either too big for one episode, or too small and stretched - I can't decide which yet.
It's odd... Doctor Who was one of those fantastic sci-fi shows that "spanned". There was something uniquely British about the three or four episode stories that left you on a cliff hanger at the end of each part. You couldn't wait for next Saturday to see what happened.
Oddly, we've now got Dr Star Trek Who. Each episode is pretty much a self contained "opening mystery, work for resolution, clever idea, win" pattern Star Trek always fell into.
Conversely, the Americans have taken on board our long episode stories and made them into the latest hits (Lost, 24, lots of others ). So Dr Who is like 70's/80's American Sci-Fi now, but the Americans are creating series which have more in common with 60's/70's/80's Dr Who.
Having said that, if you watch classic Dr Who, the episodes tend to be the actors wandering aimlessly around for most of the episode in cardboard corridors searching for something obscure and hiding around corners "waiting for the coast to be clear". At least the new Who tends to be quite action packed