DelPiero, there's the kiddie invert in China that's got a small height restriction. Don't some of the American ones end up being like 1.37m when converted from inches?
Ah yes, forgot about that one. Apart from that they are all around the 1.4M/54 Inch mark though, so when they focus on the teens with a B&M, they probably will give teens the thrill of inversions.
I think that layout looks fun and y'all need to stop bitching when :emoji_zipper_mouth:ing Toverland get a B&M.
I judge any new installation in two ways nowadays. 1 - Am I personally excited by it and would I want to make plans just for that new ride? and 2 - Does it excite me from a family perspective?
For both of these the answer is No. I won't make plans to revisit a park just for a new Wing Rider which isn't a preferential ride type for me or look to be a layout which would change that perspective, and because it's a B&M with a 1.4 restriction, my kids can't and won't be able to ride it for at least another 6 years so the installation doesn't increase the park higher up the visit list on a family basis.
Hence meh, good for the park as it will increase footfall and provide a new experience, but not exciting for me personally. Go suck a lemon