Ian said:Don't forget the VR headsets and live actors walking around.Martyn B said:I'm guessing this is going to have a hefty theme, with a pre show room and a dark ride section!
Gazza said:Aren't those 'inversions' just the two parallel lines of a normal hill?
Chris Brown said:Can anyone dig up the original Smiler plans?
To be fair though, there's not exactly one rule for one area and not for another. The exact same rules regarding planning and permissions stands for all areas of the park and additions that they're putting in - so this could be the same in terms of the ride changing from the elevations in terms of elements and direction of banking etc.Ben said:The difference with Smiler's tbf is that they're in an area of the park where the zoning means they can get away with changing the plans - they have to be a little bit more truthful this area.
They can still EASILY change but I think they'd have to get the Council to approve them.
Lofty said:To be fair though, there's not exactly one rule for one area and not for another. The exact same rules regarding planning and permissions stands for all areas of the park and additions that they're putting in - so this could be the same in terms of the ride changing from the elevations in terms of elements and direction of banking etc.Ben said:The difference with Smiler's tbf is that they're in an area of the park where the zoning means they can get away with changing the plans - they have to be a little bit more truthful this area.
They can still EASILY change but I think they'd have to get the Council to approve them.
Dar said:Looking at this plan it looks like the flume site just falls outside the GDO area (purple boundaries), so it seems these plans have to be legit?