Matt N
CF Legend
Hi guys. Sorry if there's a topic like this, but I just wanted to ask for your opinions on this matter. Basically, Mako at SeaWorld is currently my number 1 coaster, so I was interested to see how it compared with Shambhala at PortAventura, as it is another B&M hyper in another British tourist destination. Now, the vast majority of people who've ridden both say that Mako is far inferior to Shambhala, but I have heard 1 or 2 say that Mako is better, so I'm undecided. Now, Shambhala does top Mako in most of the major stats; it is 249ft tall compared with Mako's 200ft, it reaches 83mph compared with Mako's 73mph and it is 5131ft long compared with Mako's 4760ft. I personally think that Mako is a stunning ride, but I can't quite decide whether Shambhala looks better or not from not having ridden. I would be interested to hear some of your thoughts.
P.S. Sorry if this is a stupid topic. Also, if they wouldn't mind, could someone please move this to the This vs That subforum, as I couldn't seem to be able to post a thread there.
P.S. Sorry if this is a stupid topic. Also, if they wouldn't mind, could someone please move this to the This vs That subforum, as I couldn't seem to be able to post a thread there.