GuyWithAStick said:
But to do it for the cred, GO TO IT FIRST. I rode Maverick first(only a 20 min wait), and then MilF. I had to wait nearly 2 hours.
That's interesting. When I was there a few years ago, Maverick consistently had longer lines that MForce. Maverick was often over 90 minutes, whereas, MForce peaked at around 45 (maybe up to an hour).
Anyway, I haven't ridden I305, so any comparison I do is just speculation. I'd argue that the two rides really aren't that similar. I've heard the whole "Maverick and MForce combined to form I305" point before, but I don't really see it. I'd say it's more of a Maverick style ride scaled up to MForce's size, rather than a combination of the two. MForce is about a long, graceful layout with sweeping overbanks and a sensation of speed, whereas I305 is more about raw intensity and quick directional changes.
As for which I would prefer, it's hard to say. I love MForce for its fantastic drop and speed, and just being a really fun ride. I305 is somewhat polarizing, so I'm really not sure what to think of it. On the one hand, I do really like high-intensity rides such as Kumba and Batman. However, Maverick, which is somewhat similar to I305 in its style, really didn't impress me. So I'm really not sure which I would prefer, at least until I get on I305 (hopefully in the next year or two).