I mean, the best indicator here is that it only has one train even though they could have easily run 2 if they wanted. Now it's probably a little to costly to modify the ride appropiately.Does Booster Bike REALLY draw in crowds, though? Troy, I can understand, but Booster Bike... no.
Can't understand the BB shaming, guys.
the ugly duckling of the park and has bad capacity.
I am not a fan of the riding position
The Layout is nothing special
Just how they made the Zero-G-Roll taller than the airtime hill even though it comes later, because it's in the background, and they want both "phoenix flies over water"-maneuvers to be as visible as possible. That alone is so much greatness.
Booster Bike is terrible for three simple reasons:
1) It's not Tron.
2) It's terrible.
3) IT'S. NOT. TRON.
Booster Bike is terrible for three simple reasons:
1) It's not Tron.
2) It's terrible.
3) IT'S. NOT. TRON.
Just because it was first doesn't mean it's any good...If Vekoma didnt develop boosterbike there would be no Tron. And because there is now a better version that does instantly
1) If Vekoma didnt develop the boosterbike there would be no Tron.
2) Because there is now a better version of it, that instanly means that this coaster is bad?
3) Its very hard to replace that coaster cause of small place.
I would also add that there might be a slight perspective trick going on here too. In the footage I've seen the zero-g is in the foreground, meaning it will probably look a little taller than the airtime hill. Also, the trajectories are based on the train's center of mass, so the track for a zero-g is likely to be a bit higher than that of a straight airtime hill, all other things being equal.I mean... I'm pretty sure it's taller because the airtime hill provides airtime however the zero-g has to hold 0g and be somewhat parabolic. And because it hasn't lost a great deal of speed, that height is needed.