Recent content by bigjoe97

Are detailed ratings going to happen for these, or is it just going to stay at this?

Wow, tools allowed on the woodie but not on the steel. Makes perfect sense. Eh, I'll try my best, and probably fail anyway.

Alright, we need the third comp up now =P </impatience>

Results look about the same as the ratings I sent in. Second is nice for me, considering I went over all the other tracks and was expecting to get ridiculous amounts of points deducted for my three huge voyage-style hills (with huge loads of supports to match).

Hmm, I'm really not sure. It's a NL contest, so people will be sending in RCT parks, right? Yeah, you need NL.

This I sincerely doubt. El Toro has plenty of air, but -2.1 is a lot.

It's a contest between "bad tooled" and "bad handbuilt"!

Red positives I'm perfectly fine with, but red negatives aren't.

Hmm, interesting. I'm going to have to hit some more woodies next summer. However, red positives (which I did see in 2 or 3 occasions) are not excusable.

Wow, I was surprised by a lot of things. -The rides in general were crap. There were some banking transitions that were so fast it hurt to watch, and a lot of Gs that would be unacceptable on a steel, much less a woodie. SMOOTH YOUR RIDES!!!! -A lot of rides were too high above the terrain...

That is what I've been thinking all week.

I think you should just have them be "A, B, C, etc" and then release the names and creators with the final standings. On a related note, was my entry received?

Personally, I'd like an Accelerator on a template with a bunch of small-medium size open patches (free land) and thin connections between them (space between flats).

Entry sent.

Beh. My track is so long that with supports in it takes about 10 seconds to select one beam. No custom bracing for me XP